Structure-Function Relationship between the Human Chemokine Receptor CXCR3 and Its Ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I-TAC, IP10, and Mig are interferon-gamma inducible CXC chemokines that share the same G-protein-coupled receptor CXCR3, which is preferentially expressed on Th1 lymphocytes. We have explored the structure-function relationship of the CXCR3 ligands, in particular of I-TAC, which has highest affinity for CXCR3 and is the most potent agonist. A potent antagonist for CXCR3 was obtained by NH(2)-terminal truncation of I-TAC. I-TAC (4-73), which lacks the first three residues, has no agonistic activity but competes for the binding of I-TAC to CXCR3-bearing cells and inhibits migration and Ca(2+) changes in such cells in response to stimulation with I-TAC, IP10, and Mig. It does also not induce internalization of CXCR3, which is in support of the lack of agonistic effects. Hybrid chemokines between I-TAC and IP10 were used to identify regions responsible for the higher activity of I-TAC. I-TAC-like IP10 analogs are obtained by substituting the NH(2) terminus (residues 1-8) or N-loop region (residues 12-17) of IP10 with those of I-TAC, suggesting that the differences in function of the CXCR3 ligands can be assigned to distinct regions and that these regions are interchangeable. Structure-activity studies with Mig showed that the extended basic COOH-terminal region, which is not present in I-TAC and IP10, is important for binding and activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".