MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B242: A phase I/II study of oncolytic reovirus plus chemotherapy (carboplatin/paclitaxel) in patients with advanced solid tumors (with emphasis on patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

2009· article· en· W1966863570 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin J. Harrington, Eleni Karapanagiotou, Pandha Hardev, Christopher M. Nutting, Martin Gore, Mettinger Karl, Hall Geoff, Alan Melcher, Mercel Ball, Matt Coffey, Brad Thompson, John Chester

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsOncolytics Biotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOncolytic virusCarboplatinNeutropeniaInternal medicineChemotherapyPaclitaxelOncologyHead and neck cancerCancerGastroenterologyLeukopeniaCisplatin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Reovirus is a double-stranded RNA virus which replicates in cells with activated Ras signaling pathway, while sparing normal cells. Following our recent study of intravenous (i.v.) reovirus in patients with advanced malignancies1, we have conducted a Phase I/II dose escalation study of i.v. reovirus in combination with chemotherapy. Methods: REOLYSIN® was administered to cohorts of 3 patients in escalating doses (3 × 109, 1 × 1010, 3 × 1010 TCID50) on days 1–5 while carboplatin AUC 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 were administered on day 1 of a 3-weekly schedule. Eligible patients had good performance status (ECOG PS: 0–2) with advanced cancers which were not amenable to curative treatment or were refractory to standard therapy for which paclitaxel/carboplatin was appropriate palliative chemotherapy. Results: Twenty-three patients (15 males, median age 56.9 years) with head and neck cancer (n=17), melanoma (n=4) or peritoneal/endometrial cancer (n=2) received 106 cycles (median 6, range 1–8) of combination treatment. In the dose-escalation phase of the study, there were no dose-limiting toxicities. Grade 3/4 toxicities included anaemia, leucopenia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, infection and hypotension. Viral shedding (as assayed by reverse transcription PCR) has been documented in 2 patients. Neutralising anti-reovirus antibody responses have been measured using a previously reported technique2 and will be presented. In the Phase 1 study partial responses (PR) were noted in one of four patients with melanoma and in two of five patients with head and neck cancer. An expanded cohort of head and neck cancer patients was therefore treated at the maximum dose level (3 × 1010 TCID50) in order to further assess tumor response in this setting. To date, 14 patients with head and neck cancer have received at least two cycles and are evaluable for response. Most of them were refractory to previous platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent/metastatic disease. PR was seen in 6 patients (43%), SD in 5 (36%) and PD in 3 (21%). The study is ongoing. Conclusion: Intravenous administration of reovirus in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel is a safe and well-tolerated combination with promising anticancer activity in SCCHN. Further evaluation of this combination in a randomized Phase III trial in SCCHN is planned. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):B242.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207