Lactide polymerization catalyzed by Mg and Zn diketiminate complexes with flexible ligand frameworks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diketimine ligands bearing N-benzyl, N-9-anthrylmethyl and N-mesitylmethyl substituents (nacnac(Bn)H, nacnac(An)H, and nacnac(Mes)H) were prepared from condensation of the amine with either acetyl acetone or its ethylene glycol monoketal. Chlorination with N-chlorosuccinimide in the 3-position yielded Clnacnac(Bn)H and Clnacnac(An)H. The ligands were reacted with Zn(TMSA)2 (TMSA = N(SiMe3)2) to yield nacnac(An)Zn(TMSA) and Clnacnac(Bn)Zn(TMSA). Protonation with isopropanol afforded nacnac(An)ZnOiPr and Clnacnac(Bn)ZnOiPr. Reaction of the diketimines with Mg(TMSA)2 afforded nacnac(An)Mg(TMSA), nacnac(Mes)Mg(TMSA), Clnacnac(Bn)Mg(TMSA) and Clnacnac(An)Mg(TMSA). Subsequent protonation with tert-butanol produced nacnac(Mes)MgOtBu and Clnacnac(Bn)MgOtBu, but only decomposition was observed with N-anthrylmethyl substituents. Most complexes were characterized by X-ray diffraction studies. TMSA complexes were monomeric and alkoxide complexes dimeric in the solid state. All alkoxide complexes, as well as nacnac(An)Mg(TMSA)/BnOH and Clnacnac(An)Mg(TMSA)/BnOH were moderately to highly active in rac-lactide polymerization (90% conversion in 30 s to 3 h). nacnac(An)ZnOiPr produced highly heterotactic polymers (P(r) = 0.90), Clnacnac(Bn)MgOtBu/BnOH produced slightly isotactic polymers at -30 °C (P(r) = 0.43), and all other catalysts produced atactic polymers with a slight heterotactic bias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".