MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969251489 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m708466200

IQGAP1 Stimulates Proliferation and Enhances Tumorigenesis of Human Breast Epithelial Cells

2007· article· en· W1969251489 on OpenAlexaff
Lorraine Jadeski, Jennifer Mataraza, Ha‐Won Jeong, Zhigang Li, David B. Sacks

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIQGAP1CarcinogenesisBiologyScaffold proteinNeoplastic transformationCancer researchCell growthCell biologySignal transductionCancerBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The scaffold protein IQGAP1 integrates signaling pathways and participates in diverse cellular activities. IQGAP1 is overexpressed in a number of human solid neoplasms, but its functional role in tumorigenesis has not been previously evaluated. Here we report that IQGAP1 contributes to neoplastic transformation of human breast epithelial cells. The amount of IQGAP1 in breast carcinoma is greater than that in normal tissue, with highly metastatic breast epithelial cells expressing the highest levels. Overexpression of IQGAP1 enhances proliferation of MCF-7 breast epithelial cells. Reduction of endogenous IQGAP1 by RNA interference impairs both serum-dependent and anchorage-independent growth of MCF-7 cells. Consistent with these in vitro observations, immortalized MCF-7 cells overexpressing IQGAP1 form invasive tumors in immunocompromised mice, whereas tumors derived from MCF-7 cells with stable knockdown of IQGAP1 are smaller and less invasive. In vitro analysis with selected IQGAP1 mutant constructs and a chemical inhibitor suggests that actin, Cdc42/Rac1, and the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway contribute to the mechanism by which IQGAP1 increases cell invasion. Collectively, our data reveal that IQGAP1 enhances mammary tumorigenesis, suggesting that it may be a target for therapeutic intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations135
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207