Exploring the surface morphology of developing wheat starch granules by using Atomic Force Microscopy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Wheat starch granules from 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 49 days after anthesis (DAA) were imaged using AFM. Starches were scanned in their native form as well as following exposure to iodine vapour in‐situ at 100% humidity. Starch at 7 DAA exhibited only one granule population, while starches at other maturities had two size populations. Starches from all stages of maturation exhibited blocklet structures. Larger fuzzy blocklets were observed at early stages while they became smaller and less fuzzy at subsequent stages of maturity. Furthermore, at all stages, small granules had larger fuzzy blocklets and higher surface roughness than the large granule counterpart; however the surface roughness of both small and large granule fractions decreased gradually with maturation. Amorphous growth ring of starch granules with ∼1 × 1 µm to ∼3 × 6 µm size islands were also observed. In‐situ iodine exposure demonstrated that iodine interacted with glucan polymers in the amorphous background first and then spread over to polymers on top of blocklets. Iodine‐glucan polymer interaction further increased the surface roughness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it