Toward the Elucidation of the Catalytic Mechanism of the Mono-ADP-Ribosyltransferase Activity of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> Exotoxin A
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The catalytic mechanism for the mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A was investigated by steady-state and stopped-flow kinetic analyses. The rate constants for binding of the NAD(+) substrate to the enzyme were found to be 4.7 +/- 0.4 microM(-1) s(-1) and 194 +/- 15 s(-1) for k(on) and k(off), respectively. The k(on) and k(off) rate constants for the eEF-2 substrate binding to the enzyme were 320 +/- 39 microM(-1) s(-1) and 131 +/- 22 s(-1), respectively. A potent, competitive inhibitor against the enzyme, 1,8-naphthalimide, bound the enzyme with k(on) and k(off) rates of 82 +/- 9 microM(-1) s(-1) and 51 +/- 6 s(-1), respectively. Furthermore, the binding on and off rates for the reaction products, ADP-ribose and nicotinamide, were too rapid for detection with the stopped-flow technique. Investigation of the pre-steady-state kinetics for the ADP-ribose transferase activity of the toxin-enzyme showed that there is no pre-steady-state complex formed during the catalytic cycle. Binding of NAD+ and smaller compounds representing the various parts of this substrate were investigated by the fluorescence quenching of the intrinsic toxin fluorescence. The binding data revealed a significant structural change in the enzyme upon NAD+ binding that could not be accounted for on the basis of the sum of the structural changes induced by the various NAD+ constituents. Product inhibition studies were conducted with nicotinamide and eEF-2-ADP-ribose, and the results indicate that the reaction involves a random-order ternary complex mechanism. Detailed kinetic analysis revealed that the eEF-2 substrate shows sigmoidal kinetic behavior with the enzyme, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements indicated that wheat germ eEF-2 is oligomeric in solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".