Feeding Rates Affect Expression of Heat-Shock Protein 70 in Green Sturgeon Fry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Two growth trials were conducted to determine the effect of feeding rate on the responses of a heat-shock protein (hsp70) in the fry of Green Sturgeon Acipenser medirostris. Four tanks were randomly assigned to each feeding treatment: 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.5 and 15.0% of body weight/d in trial I and 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 and 7.0% of body weight/d for trial II. The fry were raised indoor at 18°C and fed a commercial salmonid soft-moist diet. Densities were 50 fry/tank in trial I fed for 49 d posthatch (dph) and 30 fry/tank in trial II fed for 70 dph. At the end of 1 week of feeding, five fish from each tank were subjected to heat shock by increasing the water temperature from 18°C to 28°C at a rate of 4°C/h and then holding at 28°C thereafter for 4 h before tissue samples were collected. Heat shock induced significant changes in the levels of hsp70 in the liver and white muscle of fish in all feeding treatments. However, feeding rate treatments had no significant effect on the basal and heat-shocked levels of hsp70 in the liver of these fish. The lowest feeding rate significantly depressed the induced level of hsp70 in the muscle of Green Sturgeon. A feeding rate of 10.0% of body weight/d is suggested for Green Sturgeon at 49 dph and 6.0% at 70 dph, based on their maximum responses of hsp70 in white muscle tissue. This study indicates that the response of hsp70 in the liver and muscle of Green Sturgeon is sensitive to heat-shock stress. The effect of different feeding rates on the response of hsp70 is also tissue-dependent. This variation should be considered when hsp70 is used as a biomarker to evaluate heat-shock response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".