The Complement Regulator C4b-Binding Protein (C4BP) Interacts with both the C4c and C4dg Subfragments of the Parent C4b Ligand: Evidence for Synergy in C4BP Subsite Binding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
C4b-binding protein (C4BP) is a multimeric serum protein that is a potent regulator of the classical and lectin complement pathways. The binding site for C4b has been localized to complement control protein (CCP) domains 1-3 of the C4BP alpha-chain and, in particular, to a cluster of positively charged amino acids predicted to be at the interface between CCP 1 and CCP 2. To determine the regions of C4b contributing to C4BP binding, we have examined via surface plasmon resonance technology the binding of the C4c and C4dg subfragments of C4b to C4BP. At half-physiologic ionic strength, specific and saturable binding was observed for both C4c and C4dg. C4c exhibited much greater ionic strength sensitivity in its binding than did C4dg. Analysis of the effect on binding of the subfragments to various C4b-binding-defective C4BP mutants, together with cross-competition experiments, suggests that the subsites in C4BP for C4c and C4dg are adjacent, but distinct. Additionally, we observed synergy in subsite filling such that the presence of C4dg enhanced the extent of C4c binding over its basal level, and vice versa. The enhanced binding of C4c in the presence of C4dg was not due to an increase in affinity but rather reflected a 2-3-fold increase in the number of sites capable of binding C4c. This suggests the existence of a conformational equilibrium between high- and low-affinity states in the C4c binding subsite within each C4BP subunit, an equilibrium which is shifted in favor of the high-affinity state by the filling of the C4dg subsite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".