Proprotein Covertases Are Responsible for Proteolysis and Inactivation of Endothelial Lipase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plasma lipoprotein metabolism is tightly regulated by several members of the triglyceride lipase family, including endothelial lipase (EL) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL). Our previous work suggested that EL is proteolytically processed. In this report, we have used a combination of epitope tagging, mutagenesis, and N-terminal sequencing to determine the precise location of the cleavage site within EL. The cleavage occurs immediately after the sequence RNKR, a known recognition sequence for the proprotein convertase (PC) family. We demonstrate that some PCs, but not all, can proteolytically cleave EL at this site and thereby directly regulate EL enzymatic activity through modulating EL cleavage. Furthermore, specific knockdown of individual PCs proves that PCs are the proteases that cleave EL in human endothelial cells. Interestingly, a homologous site in LPL is also cleaved by PCs. This action is unusual for PCs, which are traditionally known as activators of pro-proteins, and highlights a potential role of PCs in lipid metabolism through their proteolytic processing of lipases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".