Caspase 3/caspase-activated DNase promote cell differentiation by inducing DNA strand breaks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Caspase 3 is required for the differentiation of a wide variety of cell types, yet it remains unclear how this apoptotic protein could promote such a cell-fate decision. Caspase signals often result in the activation of the specific nuclease caspase-activated DNase (CAD), suggesting that cell differentiation may be dependent on a CAD-mediated modification in chromatin structure. In this study, we have investigated if caspase 3/CAD plays a role in initiating the DNA strand breaks that are known to occur during the terminal differentiation of skeletal muscle cells. Here, we show that inhibition of caspase 3 or reduction of CAD expression leads to a dramatic loss of strand-break formation and a block in the myogenic program. Caspase-dependent induction of differentiation results in CAD targeting of the p21 promoter, and loss of caspase 3 or CAD leads to a significant down-regulation in p21 expression. These results show that caspase 3/CAD promotes cell differentiation by directly modifying the DNA/nuclear microenvironment, which enhances the expression of critical regulatory genes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".