MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976442016 · doi:10.1117/12.436649

<title>Vacuum spark point source for x-ray/EUV lithography</title>

2001· article· en· W1976442016 on OpenAlexaff
Xioming Guo, Meisheng Xu, Rubin Ye, Chaofeng Huang, Kazimierz W. Wirpszo, Emilio Panarella

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Photolithography Techniques
Canadian institutionsGeneral Fusion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtreme ultraviolet lithographyOpticsLithographyComputer sciencePhysicsRadiationOptoelectronicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Vacuum Spark X-ray Source (VSX) embodies a miniature, high-repetition rate discharge emitting radiation in a broad spectrum optimized to emit soft X-rays with about 10 + wavelength. We have obtained over 100 (mu) J of energy per pulse in a narrow bandwidth centered around 7 Angstroms and pulse width less than 30 ns. The system operates with an ALFT proprietary pulser that yields a power output of 1 to 10 Watts of X-rays. A proprietary nested cone collimator is used to optimize the collection of the solid angle and direct parallel radiation towards the wafer. We predict this design will yield a throughput of 5 to 20 WLPH on 200 mm wafers. Presently, we are validating results obtained in the 1 - 5 WLPH range. ALFT's goal is to create an X-ray Point Source suitable for Next Generation Lithography. To date, two prototypes have been created to validate our theories and guide future development. The latest prototype has been designed to accept modifications to allow us to meet our 2001 performance goals. This year we achieved two major breakthroughs. We created a unique regenerating anode design that will enable thermal and debris management at the desired output levels, and we designed a trigger that ensures reliable discharge at repetition rates above 5 kHz. Following our previous SPIE Conference reports (SPIE Volume 3676-1, P. 410), the progress on the VSX Source is described here. Moreover, our technical roadmap is presented and the anode and trigger designs are disclosed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0970.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvancements in Photolithography TechniquesFrench-language works237,207