MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976442016 · doi:10.1117/12.436649

<title>Vacuum spark point source for x-ray/EUV lithography</title>

2001· article· en· W1976442016 on OpenAlexaff
Xioming Guo, Meisheng Xu, Rubin Ye, Chaofeng Huang, Kazimierz W. Wirpszo, Emilio Panarella

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Photolithography Techniques
Canadian institutionsGeneral Fusion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtreme ultraviolet lithographyOpticsLithographyComputer sciencePhysicsRadiationOptoelectronicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Vacuum Spark X-ray Source (VSX) embodies a miniature, high-repetition rate discharge emitting radiation in a broad spectrum optimized to emit soft X-rays with about 10 + wavelength. We have obtained over 100 (mu) J of energy per pulse in a narrow bandwidth centered around 7 Angstroms and pulse width less than 30 ns. The system operates with an ALFT proprietary pulser that yields a power output of 1 to 10 Watts of X-rays. A proprietary nested cone collimator is used to optimize the collection of the solid angle and direct parallel radiation towards the wafer. We predict this design will yield a throughput of 5 to 20 WLPH on 200 mm wafers. Presently, we are validating results obtained in the 1 - 5 WLPH range. ALFT's goal is to create an X-ray Point Source suitable for Next Generation Lithography. To date, two prototypes have been created to validate our theories and guide future development. The latest prototype has been designed to accept modifications to allow us to meet our 2001 performance goals. This year we achieved two major breakthroughs. We created a unique regenerating anode design that will enable thermal and debris management at the desired output levels, and we designed a trigger that ensures reliable discharge at repetition rates above 5 kHz. Following our previous SPIE Conference reports (SPIE Volume 3676-1, P. 410), the progress on the VSX Source is described here. Moreover, our technical roadmap is presented and the anode and trigger designs are disclosed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvancements in Photolithography TechniquesFrench-language works237,207