MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976686517 · doi:10.2136/vzj2010.0125

Drainage under Nonequilibrium Conditions: Exploring Wettability and Dynamic Contact Angle Effects Using Bundle‐Of‐Tubes Simulations

2011· article· en· W1976686517 on OpenAlexafffund
Kevin G. Mumford, Denis M. O’Carroll

Bibliographic record

VenueVadose Zone Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWettingContact angleMechanicsSaturation (graph theory)Non-equilibrium thermodynamicsWetting transitionMaterials scienceWork (physics)ThermodynamicsCapillary actionComposite materialPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerical simulators often assume that equilibrium capillary pressure–saturation conditions are maintained as changes in fluid saturation are taking place; however, equilibrium conditions may not be maintained in all circumstances. An alternative approach is to describe a nonequilibrium difference between wetting and nonwetting fluid pressures as a function of the rate of change of saturation and a damping coefficient. It has been proposed that this damping coefficient may be a function of multiple fluid and porous medium properties, including wettability. This study used bundle‐of‐tubes simulations to provide insight into the potential effect of increasing equilibrium contact angle, as a measure of wettability, on the magnitude of the damping coefficient. The effect of considering the dynamic contact angle, as a function of wettability, was also investigated. Results showed that when dynamic contact angles were considered, larger damping coefficient values were predicted. These values varied nonmonotonically with equilibrium contact angle and had maximum values near an equilibrium contact angle of 60°. The results also showed that values of the damping coefficient were dependent on the type of pressure boundary condition used. A steadily increasing boundary pressure resulted in larger damping coefficient values that were a function of the equilibrium contact angle, and better represented experimental pressure–saturation observations, than simulations using a series of instantaneous steps. These results suggest that assuming equilibrium conditions may be reasonable under wettability conditions characterized by equilibrium contact angles near 90°, potentially for contact angles near 0°, but not at moderate equilibrium contact angles. Further work is necessary, however, to determine the underlying physical mechanisms that govern nonequilibrium pressure differences and the magnitude of the damping coefficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVadose Zone JournalSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207