RETRACTED: Characterization of novel sequence motifs within N‐ and C‐terminal extensions of p26, a small heat shock protein from <i>Artemia franciscana</i>
Post-publication record
OpenAlex flags this work as retracted, but it carries no matching Retraction Watch record in this frame.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The small heat shock proteins function as molecular chaperones, an activity often requiring reversible oligomerization and which protects against irreversible protein denaturation. An abundantly produced small heat shock protein termed p26 is thought to contribute to the remarkable stress resistance exhibited by encysted embryos of the crustacean, Artemia franciscana. Three novel sequence motifs termed G, R and TS were individually deleted from p26 by site-directed mutagenesis. G encompasses residues G8-G29, a glycine-enriched region, and R includes residues R36-R45, an arginine-enhanced sequence, both in the amino terminus. TS, composed of residues T169-T186, resides in the carboxy-extension and is augmented in threonine and serine. Deletion of R had more influence than removal of G on p26 oligomerization and chaperoning, the latter determined by thermotolerance induction in Escherichia coli, protection of insulin and citrate synthase from dithiothreitol- and heat-induced aggregation, respectively, and preservation of citrate synthase activity upon heating. Oligomerization of the TS and R variants was similar, but the TS deletion was slightly more effective than R as a chaperone. The extent of p26 structural perturbation introduced by internal deletions, including modification of intrinsic fluorescence, 1-anilino-8-naphthalene-sulphonate binding and secondary structure, paralleled reductions in oligomerization and chaperoning. Three-dimensional modeling of p26 based on wheat Hsp16.9 crystal structure indicated many similarities between the two proteins, including peptide loops associated with secondary structure elements. Loop 1 of p26 was deleted in the G variant with minimal effect on oligomerization and chaperoning, whereas loop 3, containing beta-strand 6 was smaller than the corresponding loop in Hsp16.9, which may influence p26 function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".