MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1978835419 · doi:10.1111/imm.12433

The atypical <scp>MAPK ERK</scp>3 controls positive selection of thymocytes

2014· article· en· W1978835419 on OpenAlexafffund
Julien Sirois, Jean‐François Daudelin, Salix Boulet, Miriam Marquis, Sylvain Meloche, Nathalie Labrecque

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Research in Immunology and CancerUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMAPK/ERK pathwayThymocyteBiologyKinaseT-cell receptorCell biologyMolecular biologyTransgeneT cellImmunologyGeneGeneticsImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 3 (ERK3 )is an atypical member of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family. We have previously shown that ERK3 is expressed during thymocyte differentiation and that its expression is induced in mature peripheral T cells following activation of ERK1/2 by T-cell receptor (TCR) signalling. Herein, we have investigated whether ERK3 expression is required for proper T-cell selection. Using a knock-in mouse model in which the coding sequence of ERK3 is replaced by the gene encoding for the β-galactosidase reporter, we show that ERK3 is expressed by double-positive (DP) thymocytes undergoing positive selection. In ERK3-deficient mice with a polyclonal TCR repertoire, we observe a decrease in positive selection. This reduction in positive selection was also observed when ERK3-deficient mice were backcrossed to class I- and class II-restricted TCR transgenic mice. Furthermore, the response of DP thymocytes to in vitro TCR stimulation was strongly reduced in ERK3-deficient mice. Together, these results show that ERK3 expression following TCR signalling is critical for proper thymic positive selection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunologySame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207