Diboron and Triboron Compounds Based on Linear and Star-Shaped Conjugated Ligands with 8-Hydroxyquinolate Functionality: Impact of Intermolecular Interaction and Boron Coordination on Luminescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New 8-R-quinoline functionalized linear and star-shaped conjugated molecules have been synthesized using Suzuki-Miyaura coupling methods (R = MeO, L1-L5; R = CH3OCH2O, L1'-L5'). When treated with HCl, L1'-L5' are converted readily to the corresponding 8-hydroxyquinoline compounds L(OH)1-L(OH)5 which react readily with BPh3 in refluxing THF to produce the corresponding polyboron chelate compounds B1-B5 in good yields. L1-L5 and B1-B5 display similar thermal stability with Td at approximately 300 degrees C. Experimental and molecular orbital calculation results showed that the chelation by boron stabilizes the LUMO level of the ligand and narrows the HOMO-LUMO gap, resulting in the blue emission of the ligands and the green or orange emission of the boron compounds. Crystal structures of L1, L3, and L5 showed that these molecules have layered arrangements in the solid state with significant intermolecular pi-pi interactions. The linear diboron B5 displays concentration and temperature-dependent emission in solution, attributable to intermolecular interactions. The properties of a monoboron compound BPh2(5-Ph-8-MeO-q) (B0) and its corresponding free ligand L0 were investigated and compared to the closely related diboron compound B1 and the ligand L1, which revealed that the increase of the number of chromophores linked by an aromatic group has a significant impact on thermal stability and the HOMO and LUMO energy levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".