Inhibitors of human indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase identified with a target‐based screen in yeast
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is a tryptophan degradation enzyme that is emerging as an important drug target. IDO is expressed by many human tumors to help them escape immune detection, and it has been implicated in depression and in the formation of senile nuclear cataracts. There is a need for potent and selective IDO inhibitors for use in research and as lead compounds for drug development. We show that expression of human IDO in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae tryptophan auxotroph restricts yeast growth in the presence of low tryptophan concentrations and that inhibition of IDO activity can restore growth. We use this assay to screen for IDO inhibitors in collections of pure chemicals and crude natural extracts. We identify NSC 401366 (imidodicarbonimidic diamide, N-methyl-N'-9-phenanthrenyl-, monohydrochloride) as a potent nonindolic IDO inhibitor (Ki=1.5 +/- 0.2 microM) that is competitive with respect to tryptophan. We also use this assay to identify the active compound caulerpin from a crude algal extract. The yeast growth restoration assay is simple and inexpensive. It combines desirable attributes of cell- and target-based screens and is an attractive tool for chemical biology and drug screening.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it