S1 satellite DNA as a taxonomic marker in brown frogs: molecular evidence that Rana graeca graeca and Rana graeca italica are different species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The brown frog Rana graeca was believed to be present in two areas, the Balkan Peninsula and the Italian Apennines. We have characterised the S1 satellite DNA family from Rana graeca graeca and compared it with that of Rana graeca italica. On Southern blots, the patterns of S1 satellite DNA bands are very different between Italian and Greek specimens, but homogeneous among various populations of the same taxon. The satellite DNA from the Greek taxon contains two repetitive units (S1a (494 bp) and S1b (363 bp)) that could be sequenced after amplification from genomic DNA to directly yield their consensus sequences in each genome. These consensus sequences were very similar among the Greek populations, but differed either in sequence (in S1a) or in both size and sequence (in S1b) from the corresponding repeats of the Italian taxon. A mechanism of concerted evolution is likely responsible for the high homogeneity of S1a and S1b repeat sequences within each genome and species. The genomic content of S1 satellite DNA was lower in the Greek than in the Italian populations (0.5 vs. 1.9%) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis showed the S1 satellite on only 4 chromosome pairs in the Greek taxon and on all 13 chromosome pairs in the Italian taxon. The completely different structure and genomic organization of the S1 satellite DNA indicate that the Greek and Italian taxa are distinct species: R. graeca and R. italica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".