Role of nuclear protein denaturation and aggregation in thermal radiosensitization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyperthermia at temperatures above 41 degrees C denatures a set of thermolabile cellular proteins located in all parts of the cell. Non-histone nuclear proteins, including those comprising the nuclear matrix, appear to be particularly thermolabile. Heating isolated nuclear matrices of Chinese hamster lung (CHL) V79 cells to 46 degrees C at 1 degree C/min results in approximately 15% denaturation. Protein unfolding during denaturation exposes buried hydrophobic residues, which increases protein-protein interactions and results in the co-aggregation of denatured thermolabile proteins and native, aggregative-sensitive nuclear proteins. This aggregated protein, the majority of which is native, is insoluble and resistant to extraction during isolation of nuclei and is responsible for the increased protein content, usually expressed as an increased protein:DNA ratio, of nuclei isolated from heated cells. A large fraction of the aggregated protein is found to be associated with the nuclear matrix, distributed throughout the fibre network and nucleolus. Three general consequences of nuclear protein denaturation and aggregation of relevance to cellular damage are: (1) protein (enzyme) inactivation, both direct inactivation of thermolabile proteins and indirect inactivation due to co-aggregation; (2) reduced accessibility and altered physical properties of DNA due to masking by aggregated protein; and (3) protein redistribution into and out of the nucleus. Functional impairment of the nucleus appears to be due to one or a combination of these basic mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".