Homooligomeric and Heterooligomeric Associations between K+-Cl– Cotransporter Isoforms and between K+-Cl– and Na+-K+-Cl– Cotransporters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Little is known regarding the quaternary structure of cation-Cl- cotransporters (CCCs) except that the Na+-dependent CCCs can exist as homooligomeric units. Given that each of the CCCs exhibits unique functional properties and that several of these carriers coexist in various cell types, it would be of interest to determine whether the four K+-Cl- cotransporter (KCC) isoforms and their splice variants can also assemble into such units and, more importantly, whether they can form heterooligomers by interacting with each other or with the secretory Na+-K+-Cl- cotransporter (NKCC1). In the present work, we have addressed these questions by conducting two groups of analyses: 1) yeast two-hybrid and pull-down assays in which CCC-derived protein segments were used as both bait and prey and 2) coimmunoprecipitation and functional studies of intact CCCs coexpressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Through a combination of such analyses, we have found that KCC2 and KCC4 could adopt various oligomeric states (in the form of KCC2-KCC2, KCC4-KCC4, KCC2-KCC4, and even KCC4-NKCC1 complexes), that their carboxyl termini were probably involved in carrier assembly, and that the KCC4-NKCC1 oligomers, more specifically, could deploy unique functional features. Through additional coimmunoprecipitation studies, we have also found that KCC1 and KCC3 had the potential of assembling into various types of CCC-CCC oligomers as well, although the interactions uncovered were not characterized as extensively, and the protein segments involved were not identified in yeast two-hybrid assays. Taken together, these findings could change our views on how CCCs operate or are regulated in animal cells by suggesting, in particular, that cation-Cl- cotransport achieves higher levels of functional diversity than foreseen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".