Construction of an RAPD linkage map and localization of QTLs for oleic acid level using recombinant inbreds in mustard (<i>Brassica juncea</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RAPD markers were employed for construction of a linkage map and localization of QTLs for oleic acid level using a set of 94 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) as a mapping population. Only 30% of the 235 random primers used were useful in terms of polymorphism detected and the reproducibility of those patterns. Normal Mendelian segregation was observed for the majority of the 130 markers obtained with 71 informative primers; only 13.1% deviated (P < 0.01) from the expected 1:1 ratio. One-hundred and fourteen markers were assigned to 21 linkage groups (LGs) covering a total length of 790.4 cM with an average distance of 6.93 cM between markers. Two quantitative trait loci (QTL) for oleic acid level were mapped to 14- and 10.6-cM marker intervals on two different LGs. Both loci together explained 32.2% of phenotypic variance. One major QTL explained 28.5% of the trait variance observed in this species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".