A phase I/II randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐ranging study evaluating the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of ravuconazole in the treatment of onychomycosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and safety of ravuconazole in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. DESIGN: A phase I/II randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Four 12-week dosing regimens were used: 200 mg/day; 100 mg/week; 400 mg/week and placebo. Subjects returned at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 24, 36 and 48 for assessment. Subjects were enrolled at 10 dermatology practices (seven in the United States, one in Canada, two in France). SUBJECTS: Adults with distal subungual onychomycosis of one great (hallux) toenail (minimum area of 25%), and at least 2 mm of proximal nail clear of disease were selected. Onychomycosis was confirmed by direct microscopy and/or fungal culture. Subjects with conditions known to produce abnormal-appearing nails were excluded. One hundred and fifty-one subjects were randomized in a 2:2:2:1 ratio to the treatments above. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary efficacy was the effective cure rate at week 48 (mycological cure, and clinical cure or > 30% improvement). RESULTS: Effective cure was found in 56% of subjects using 200 mg/day. Effective cure was 10% in subjects receiving 100 mg/week, 8% of subjects using 400 mg/week, and 15% of subjects using placebo. Mycological cure was seen in 59% of subjects in the 200-mg/day group, which was significantly higher than the rates found in the other groups. Drug-related adverse events were infrequent in all treatment arms. Headache was the most frequently reported event. Abnormal laboratory tests were infrequent over the 12 weeks of dosing. Abnormal laboratory findings with increases beyond normal of Grade 2, 3 or 4 were found in 8/148 subjects (5.4%). Only the 200 mg daily regimen had a mean plasma steady state concentration of ravuconazole exceeding the MIC(90) adjusted for 98% protein binding (3000 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of onychomycosis, ravuconazole 200 mg/day for 12 weeks is the most effective of the regimens investigated. The safety of all regimens was acceptable. The concentrations of ravuconazole in the plasma compared to the adjusted MIC(90) may be useful in predicting the clinical and mycologic response of therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".