MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987650885 · doi:10.1128/jcm.00634-10

High-Throughput Genotyping of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the <i>Plasmodium falciparum dhfr</i> Gene by Asymmetric PCR and Melt-Curve Analysis

2010· article· en· W1987650885 on OpenAlexaff
Rochelle E. Cruz, Sandra E. Shokoples, Dammika P. Manage, Stephanie K. Yanow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Microbiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsProvincial Laboratory of Public HealthUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTaqManGenotypingMelting curve analysisSingle-nucleotide polymorphismHigh Resolution MeltSNP genotypingAmpliconMolecular biologyPlasmodium falciparumGenotypeVariants of PCRGeneticsMolecular Inversion ProbePolymerase chain reactionGeneVirologyMalaria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mutations within the Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase gene (Pfdhfr) contribute to resistance to antimalarials such as sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP). Of particular importance are the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within codons 51, 59, 108, and 164 in the Pfdhfr gene that are associated with SP treatment failure. Given that traditional genotyping methods are time-consuming and laborious, we developed an assay that provides the rapid, high-throughput analysis of parasite DNA isolated from clinical samples. This assay is based on asymmetric real-time PCR and melt-curve analysis (MCA) performed on the LightCycler platform. Unlabeled probes specific to each SNP are included in the reaction mixture and hybridize differentially to the mutant and wild-type sequences within the amplicon, generating distinct melting curves. Since the probe is present throughout PCR and MCA, the assay proceeds seamlessly with no further addition of reagents. This assay was validated for analytical sensitivity and specificity using plasmids, purified genomic DNA from reference strains, and parasite cultures. For all four SNPs, correct genotypes were identified with 100 copies of the template. The performance of the assay was evaluated with a blind panel of clinical isolates from travelers with low-level parasitemia. The concordance between our assay and DNA sequencing ranged from 84 to 100% depending on the SNP. We also directly compared our MCA assay to a published TaqMan real-time PCR assay and identified major issues with the specificity of the TaqMan probes. Our assay provides a number of technical improvements that facilitate the high-throughput screening of patient samples to identify SP-resistant malaria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MicrobiologySame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207