Mechanisms for Intragenic Complementation at the Human Argininosuccinate Lyase Locus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Argininosuccinate lyase (ASL) is a homotetrameric enzyme that catalyzes the reversible cleavage of argininosuccinate to arginine and fumarate. Deficiencies in the enzyme result in the autosomal, recessive disorder argininosuccinic aciduria. Considerable clinical and genetic heterogeneity is associated with this disorder, which is thought to be a consequence of the extensive intragenic complementation identified in patient strains. Our ability to predict genotype-phenotype relationships is hampered by the current lack of understanding of the mechanisms by which complementation can occur. The 3-dimensional structure of wild-type ASL has enabled us to propose that the complementation between two ASL active site mutant subunits, Q286R and D87G, occurs through a regeneration of functional active sites in the heteromutant protein. We have reconstructed this complementation event, both in vivo and in vitro, using recombinant proteins and have confirmed this hypothesis. The complementation events between Q286R and two nonactive site mutants, M360T and A398D, have also been characterized. The M360T and A398D substitutions have adverse effects on the thermodynamic stability of the protein. Complementation between either the M360T or the A398D mutant and the stable Q286R mutant occurs through the formation of a more stable heteromeric protein with partial recovery of catalytic activity. The detection and characterization of a novel complementation event between the A398D and D87G mutants has shown how complementation in patients with argininosuccinic aciduria may correlate with the clinical phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".