Calpain Activation by Cooperative Ca2+ Binding at Two Non-EF-hand Sites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The active site residues in calpain are mis-aligned in the apo, Ca(2+)-free form. Alignment for catalysis requires binding of Ca2+ to two non-EF-hand sites, one in each of the core domains I and II. Using domain swap constructs between the protease cores of the mu and m isoforms (which have different Ca2+ requirements) and structural and biochemical characterization of site-directed mutants, we have deduced the order of Ca2+ binding and the basis of the cooperativity between the two sites. Ca2+ binds first to the partially preformed site in domain I. Knockout of this site through D106A substitution eliminates binding to this domain as shown by the crystal structure of D106A muI-II. However, at elevated Ca2+ concentrations this mutant still forms the double salt bridge that links the two Ca2+ sites and becomes nearly as active as muI-II. Elimination of the bridge in E333A muI-II has a more drastic effect on enzyme action, especially at low Ca2+ concentrations. Domain II Ca2+ binding appears essential, because Ca(2+)-coordinating side-chain mutants E302R and D333A have severely impaired muI-II activation and activity. The introduction of mutations into the whole heterodimeric enzyme that eliminate the salt bridge or Ca2+ binding to domain II produce similar phenotypes, suggesting that the protease core Ca2+ switch is crucial and cannot be overridden by Ca2+ binding to other domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".