MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The effect of gap size on dipole impedance using the induced EMF method

2010· article· en· W1992703089 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersAalborg Universitet
KeywordsDipole antennaDipoleAntenna (radio)Electrical impedanceRadiation impedanceInput impedanceRadiation patternPhysicsLoop antennaImpedance matchingSusceptanceComputational physicsMethod of moments (probability theory)Magnetic dipoleAcousticsOpticsComputer scienceRadiationMathematicsCoaxial antennaTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dipole is the fundamental elemental antenna. Moreover, the electric dipole and its monopole equivalent on a groundplane are widely used in practice. Despite the long history of dipole research, its complete impedance behaviour remains elusive. In numerical techniques, such as the method of moments, a gap voltage feed can be expected to give a well-defined radiation conductance but a susceptance which is dissimilar to that of a realized antenna, whereas an impressed current feed can give a well-defined radiation resistance, but dissimilar reactance. The reason is that neither of these feeds accurately model the input region of a practical dipole. Two analytic approaches to the dipole impedance are available - the wave structure method and the induced EMF method. The wave structure method does not lend itself to feed detail, but reveals the impact of dipole thickness and length on the impedance of dipoles which is not available from any other approach. It is reliable for short lengths but it remains restricted to an infinitesimal feed gap, i.e., different to a practical dipole antenna. The induced EMF method is accurate for short and impracticably thin antennas. Electromagnetic simulation techniques can be used for practical dipole thicknesses, but no theory is available to benchmark the results of the numerical experiments. The feed modeling remains a long standing problem in terms of accurately matching the complete impedance to physical experimental results. To make a theoretical start on the problem, the induced EMF method with finite feed gap is solved here and the impedance of the thin dipole is presented. The effect of feed gap size for the finite length wire, e.g. the dipole antenna, has not been studied before. From the induced EMF method, the lossless, thin dipole with finite gap turns out to have an extremely wide bandwidth when terminated with 50 or 75 ohms, a new and interesting result in antenna theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207