CO<sub>2</sub>‐derived latent nitrogen nucleophiles for controlled cross‐linking of brominated poly(isobutylene‐<i>co</i>‐isoprene)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract New methods for preparing thermoset elastomer products from brominated poly(isobutylene‐ co ‐isoprene) (BIIR) are described, wherein control of cross‐linking dynamics is gained using latent forms of ammonia, primary amines, and cyclic amidines. BIIR cross‐linking by repeated alkylation of standard nitrogen nucleophiles is too rapid at standard polymer processing temperatures, whereas CO 2 ‐derived salts are shown to be sufficiently inactive under these conditions to support conventional BIIR compounding. Examples include the carbonate, bicarbonate and carbamate salts of ammonia; carbamate and carbamate esters of hexadecyl amine; and the bicarbonate salt of 1,8‐diazabicyclo[5.4.1]undec‐7‐ene. Thermal decomposition of these latent curatives releases CO 2 and the desired nucleophile to support high cross‐linking rates and yields at standard cure temperatures. Thermogravimetric analysis of salt decomposition, rheological measurements of cross‐link density, and spectroscopic analysis of polymer dehydrohalogenation products are used to define the relationship between latent nucleophile activation and BIIR cure dynamics. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".