MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1993795170 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2010.05.1398

P2‐347: Absence of MDR‐1 P‐glycoprotein at the blood‐brain barrier increased the passage of blood‐borne exogenous Aβ peptides across the BBB into the brain

2010· article· en· W1993795170 on OpenAlexaff
Wandong Zhang, Huaqi Xiong, Shanshan Shen, Aimee Jones, Peilin Huang, Howard Njoo, Jun Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of OttawaInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood–brain barrierTransporterP-glycoproteinIn vivoGlycoproteinPathogenesisReceptorBiologyEx vivoKnockout mousePharmacologyIn vitroCell biologyMolecular biologyChemistryImmunologyCentral nervous systemBiochemistryGeneNeuroscienceMultiple drug resistanceGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by accumulation and deposition of Aβ peptides in the brain. Experimental studies showed that Aβ can be transported across blood-brain barrier (BBB). Aberrant Aβ transport across BBB may contribute to accumulation and deposition of Aβ in the brain. Some studies suggested that mis-folded Aβ can be transmitted via transfusion from donors to recipients, which may be a risk factor of AD pathogenesis. Several transporters/receptors are involved in Aβ transport across BBB. MDR-1 P-glycoprotein/ABCB1 (Pgp) is highly expressed in cerebroendothelial cells and acts as a major drug transporter at the BBB. Pgp was shown to play a substantial role in Aβ elimination from brain. However, it is unknown whether Pgp can prevent blood-borne exogenous Aβ from entering the brain. In the present study, we investigated the role of Pgp in the passage of blood-borne Aβ across the BBB into the brain. Cy5.5-labeled Aβ1-40 or Cy5.5 free-dye were injected intravenously into mdr-1a/b knockout (Pgp-null) and wild-type (wt) mice. The mice were scanned alive with a time-domain optical imager eXplore Optix at 2, 4, 6, and 8h post-injection for Cy5.5 fluorescence accumulation in the brain. Mice were sacrificed at 8h and their ex vivo brains were scanned. The concentration of Cy5.5 fluorescence in the heads of Pgp-null mice was higher at 4 time-points than that in wt mice injected with the same amount of Cy5.5-labeled Aβ1-40 (Pgp-null/wt mice: 2h: 124.61%/100%; 4h: 126.21%/100%; 6h: 116.03%/100%; 8h: 141.28%/100%). The fluorescent concentration in the ex vivo brain was also higher in Pgp-null mice (109.33%) than wt (100%). Two pairs of Pgp-null mice were injected with either Cy5.5-labeled Aβ peptides or Cy5.5 free-dye in equal fluorescent intensity and their ex vivo brains were scanned at 8h. The two Pgp-null mice injected with Cy5.5-labeled Aβ had about 1.5-fold higher fluorescence in their brains than the Pgp-null mice injected with Cy5.5 free-dye in equal fluorescent intensity, suggesting that Cy5.5-labeled Aβ peptides easily trans-passed BBB into brain than Cy5.5 free-dye in Pgp-null mice. These results indicate that the absence of Pgp at the BBB increased the passage of blood-borne exogenous Aβ across the BBB into the brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→