A prospective, randomized, placebo‐controlled evaluation of corticoneuronal response to intrathecal BDNF therapy in ALS using magnetic resonance spectroscopy: feasibility and results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the multicenter, phase III trial of intrathecal BDNF in ALS, we evaluated the neuronal marker N-acetylaspartate (NAA) as a surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) in a prospective and blinded manner. Selected subjects tolerated the study well without pump malfunction. The NAA to creatine (Cr) intensity ratio (NAA/Cr) was measured in the precentral and postcentral gyri, the superior parietal lobule, the supplementary motor area, and the premotor cortex. After 4.5+/-0.6 weeks treatment, NAA/Cr did not change significantly in any of the regions in the BDNF-treated group (n=5) compared to the placebo group (n=6). The lack of change in NAA correlated with the lack of clinical efficacy and supports the validity of NAA/Cr as a surrogate in this setting. MRSI is a feasible and safe method to evaluate intrathecal therapies in ALS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".