Positron Emission Tomography Quantification of [<sup>11</sup>C]-Harmine Binding to Monoamine Oxidase-A in the Human Brain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article describes the kinetic modeling of [(11)C]-harmine binding to monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) binding sites in the human brain using positron emission tomography (PET). Positron emission tomography studies were performed in healthy volunteers at placebo conditions and after treatment with clinical doses of moclobemide. In either condition, a two-tissue compartment model (2CM) provided better fits to the data than a one-tissue model. Estimates of k(3)/k(4) values from an unconstrained 2CM were highly variable. In contrast, estimates of the specifically bound radioligand distribution volume (DV(B)) from an unconstrained 2CM were exceptionally stable, correlated well with the known distribution of MAO-A in the brain (cerebellum <frontal cortex approximately putamen <temporal cortex approximately cingulate <thalamus) and thus provided reliable indices of MAO-A density. Total distribution volume (DV) values were also highly stable and not different from those estimated with the Logan approach. Fixing the DV of free and nonspecifically bound radiotracer (DV(F + NS)) or coupling DV(F + NS) between brain regions enabled more stable estimates of k(3)/k(4) as compared with an unconstrained 2CM. Moclobemide treatment leads to a 64% to 79% MAO-A blockade across brain regions, a result that supports the specificity of [(11)C]-harmine binding to MAO-A. The stability and reliability of DV(B) values obtained from an unconstrained 2CM, together with the computational simplicity associated with this method, support the use of DV(B) as an appropriate outcome measure for [(11)C]-harmine. These results indicate the suitability of using [(11)C]-harmine for quantitative evaluation of MAO-A densities using PET and should enable further studies of potential MAO-A dysregulation in several psychiatric and neurologic illnesses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".