Benefits and Risks of Adopting the Global Code of Practice for Recreational Fisheries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Recreational fishing constitutes the dominant or sole use of many fish stocks, particularly in freshwater ecosystems in Western industrialized countries. However, despite their social and economic importance, recreational fisheries are generally guided by local or regional norms and standards, with few comprehensive policy and development frameworks existing across jurisdictions. We argue that adoption of a recently developed Global Code of Practice (CoP) for Recreational Fisheries can provide benefits for moving recreational fisheries toward sustainability on a global scale. The CoP is a voluntary document, specifically framed toward recreational fisheries practices and issues, thereby complementing and extending the United Nation's Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries by the Food and Agricultural Organization. The CoP for Recreational Fisheries describes the minimum standards of environmentally friendly, ethically appropriate, and—depending on local situations—socially acceptable recreational fishing and its management. Although many, if not all, of the provisions presented in the CoP are already addressed through national fisheries legislation and state-based fisheries management regulations in North America, adopting a common framework for best practices in recreational fisheries across multiple jurisdictions would further promote their long-term viability in the face of interjurisdictional angler movements and some expanding threats to the activity related to shifting sociopolitical norms. RESUMEN las pesquerías recreativas constituyen el uso dominante, y a veces el único, de diversas poblaciones de peces, particularmente en ecosistemas dulceacuícolas en pueblos occidentales industrializados. No obstante, a pesar de su importancia social y económica, la pesca recreativa es comúnmente regulada por normas y estándares locales o regionales, con marcos políticos y de desarrollo poco comprensibles y una comunicación inter-jurisdiccional deficiente. En este trabajo se argumenta que la adopción de un Código Global de Prácticas (CGP), de reciente creación, para pesquerías recreativas puede ofrecer beneficios útiles para el tránsito de la pesca recreativa hacia la sustentabilidad a escala global. El CGP es un documento voluntario, especialmente diseñado para las prácticas y temas relativos a la pesca recreativa, por lo que complementa y extiende el Código de Conducta de la Pesca Responsable elaborado por La Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. El CGC para pesquerías recreativas describe los estándares mínimos, ambientalmente amigables, éticamente apropiados y socialmente aceptables en las prácticas y manejo de la pesca recreativa. Si bien muchas, si no es que todas, las previsiones presentadas en el CGC ya comienzan a tratarse en la legislación pesquera nacional y en las regulaciones estatales de manejo en los Estados Unidos de Norteamérica, la adopción de un marco común que defina las mejores prácticas en las pesquerías recreativas a través de diversas jurisdicciones, promoverá aun más su viabilidad a largo plazo. Tal promoción se está dando de cara a movimientos inter-jurisdiccionales en pro de la pesca con línea y de amenazas crecientes a la actividad que están relacionadas al cambio en las normas sociopolíticas.el sábalo americano representa una invasión nociva o una introducción benéfica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".