How the Substituent at O-3 of <i>N</i>-Acetylglucosamine Impacts Glycosylation at O-4: A Comparative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An assessment of the relative reactivities of the 4-OH of N-acetylglucosamine acceptors bearing simple protecting groups, beta-linked or alpha-linked D or L sugars at O-3 is presented, using a per-O-acetylated alpha-D-glucosyl trichloroacetimidate donor under activation by BF(3) x OEt(2). The presence of either an acyl or carbonate protecting group at O-3 did not impact the reactivity at O-4 with all glycosylations proceeding successfully. On the other hand, the presence of peracetylated sugars at O-3 of N-acetylglucosamine acceptors did impact the reactivity of the 4-OH. The acceptors with an alpha-D-Man, beta-D-Gal, or beta-D-Glc at O-3 reacted promptly. In comparison, the acceptors bearing a beta-L-Fuc, alpha-L-Fuc, or alpha-L-Rha underwent glucosylation slowly, and unreacted acceptor was recovered from the reaction mixtures. Systematic searches carried out on the disaccharide acceptors and trisaccharide products carrying either a peracetylated beta-D-Gal or beta-L-Fuc at O-3 of the glucosamine residue suggest that, for these two acceptors, a conformational reorientation necessary around the fucosidic linkage contributes to the lower reactivity of the beta-fucosylated acceptor. The acceptors bearing a beta-linked D-Gal, D-Glc, or L-Fuc residue at O-3 each gave trisaccharide products that were mostly stable in the reaction conditions. In contrast, the alpha-linked residues at O-3 were rather unstable in these reaction conditions and the degradation of either the acceptors or trisaccharide products led to low glycosylation yields. In these later reactions, it was impossible to clearly assess which of the acceptor or product underwent degradation as comigration and detection issues prevented us from following these glycosylations by TLC or RP-HPLC. In contrast, the glycosylation of an acceptor carrying an alpha-linked perbenzylated L-Fuc residue at O-3 could be easily monitored by RP-HPLC. The data obtained when monitoring this glycosylation showed that the acceptor underwent prompt glycosylation but a decrease in the absorbance peak corresponding to the trisaccharide along with the appearance of a peak corresponding to a perbenzylated fucose hemiacetal indicated that the trisaccharide product was unstable in the reaction conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".