Cytogenetic evidence of nucleolar dominance in allotetraploid species of<i>Brachypodium</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sequential silver staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used to establish activity and number of 45S rDNA sites in meristematic root tip cells of 6 ecotypes of allotetraploid (2n = 4x = 30) species of Brachypodium and their putative ancestors, B. distachyon (2n = 2x = 10) and ABR114 (2n = 2x = 20). Using either total nuclear DNA of ABR114 or the ABR1-63-E6 BAC clone from a B. distachyon genomic library as an auxiliary probe, it was possible to distinguish by FISH between the two genomes composing the ecotypes of allotetraploid Brachypodium species and to determine unambiguously the parentage of both dominant and suppressed rRNA genes. Each of the diploid species possessed two rDNA loci, both transcriptionally active. The number of 45S rDNA sites in 6 ecotypes of allotetraploid Brachypodium species was always equal to the sum of loci present in their putative diploid parents. Two smaller sites were located in chromosomes corresponding to the ABR114 chromosomal set, and two larger ones in the chromosomes of B. distachyon origin. In all analyzed allotetraploid ecotypes, only rRNA genes belonging to the B. distachyon-like genome were transcriptionally active, while rDNA from the other parental genome was always suppressed. Thus the occurrence of nucleolar dominance in the allotetraploid (2n = 4x = 30) species of Brachypodium is demonstrated for the first time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".