Eculizumab for treatment of asthma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Asthma is an inflammatory disease, which can be exacerbated by stimuli such as viral infections and exposure to allergens. Asthma continues to be a profound public health problem due to asthma exacerbation in a low proportion of patients in need of more effective medications. AREAS COVERED: The C5 complement pathway has been proposed as a new target for the treatment of asthma, supported by clinical observations of increased C5a levels in asthmatic airways, constitutive expression of C5 receptors on bronchial epithelium and smooth muscle cells, and preclinical studies in mice demonstrating inhibition of C5 cleavage reduced established airway inflammation and improves lung function. Eculizumab is a monoclonal antibody, which binds to the complement protein C5, thereby preventing the formation of C5a and C5b-9. The research discussed in this review describes development of eculizumab for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and the efficacy of eculizumab on allergen-induced asthmatic responses in a placebo-controlled study. EXPERT OPINION: In an allergen-challenge model of asthma, there was a significant period effect with eculizumab, with inhibition of the late asthmatic response in subjects who received placebo treatment first. Although this study provides some evidence that eculizumab may be effective to attenuate allergen-induced responses, the role of C5 in asthma remains to be clarified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".