Ectomycorrhizas increase apoplastic water transport and root hydraulic conductivity in <i>Ulmus americana</i> seedlings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary The extent to which water channel transport is responsible for the observed increases in root water flow of ectomycorrhizal plants is reported here. To examine the contribution of water channel transport to root hydraulic conductance, temperatures in the range 4–20°C and mercuric chloride (HgCl 2 ) were used to study the kinetics of water transport in ectomycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal roots of American elm ( Ulmus americana ) seedlings. Hydraulic conductance declined with decreasing temperatures in both mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal seedlings. However, hydraulic conductance and conductivity were higher in the mycorrhizal than the nonmycorrhizal roots at all temperatures studied. Mercuric chloride had a relatively greater impact on root hydraulic conductance in nonmycorrhizal than mycorrhizal roots and activation energy for root hydraulic conductance was significantly higher in mycorrhizal than nonmycorrhizal plants. The results suggest that ectomycorrhizal hyphae increase hydraulic conductance of roots by decreasing water flow resistance of the apoplast rather than by water channel‐mediated transport. The high rates of hydraulic conductance at low root temperatures might be important to plants growing in cold soils and under other challenging environmental conditions that inhibit metabolism and limit water transport.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".