MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998231701 · doi:10.1002/poc.453

Preparation of the tricyclo[5.3.1.1<sup>3,9</sup>]dodeca‐1,5‐diyl dication: attempts to prepare a novel µ‐H cation

2001· article· en· W1998231701 on OpenAlexafffund
Christoph Taeschler, Masood Parvez, Ted S. Sorensen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Organic Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular spectroscopy and chirality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDicationChemistryAb initioAb initio quantum chemistry methodsIonComputational chemistryMedicinal chemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The tricyclo[5.3.1.1 3,9 ]dodeca‐3,7‐diyl dication ( 6 ) was prepared in situ and characterized by 1 H and 13 C NMR spectroscopy. Reaction of this dication with isopentane, NaBH 4 or H 2 , in an attempt to prepare the µ ‐H cation 7 , did result in hydride transfer, but to the ‘outside’ face of the dication, leading to the conventional monocation 8 , or rearrangement products of this. This monocation was independently prepared, and is thermally less stable than the dication, rearranging to the 2‐ethyl‐2‐adamantyl cation ( 19 ) at −60 °C, Δ G ‡ = 16.0 ± 0.6 kcal mol −1 . The 2‐methyltricyclo[4.3.1.1 3,7 ]undec‐2‐yl cation ( 20 ), a likely intermediate in this rearrangement, was also independently prepared and shown to rearrange to 19 , Δ G ‡ = 14.4 ± 0.3 kcal mol −1 , consistent with a stepwise rearrangement process for 8 →[ 20 ]→ 19 . The structures of dication 6 and monocation 8 were investigated by high‐level ab initio calculations, and modeling studies were carried out to look at the factors that allow dications such as 6 to even be prepared. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical Organic ChemistrySame topicMolecular spectroscopy and chiralityFrench-language works237,207