Production and processing of a recombinant Fasciola hepatica cathepsin B-like enzyme (FhcatB1) reveals potential processing mechanisms in the parasite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica, apparently uses a number of cysteine proteases during its life cycle, most likely for feeding, immune evasion and invasion of tissues. A cathepsin B-like enzyme (herein referred to as FhcatB1) appears to be a major enzyme secreted by the invasive, newly excysted juvenile flukes of this parasite. To examine the processing mechanisms for this enzyme, a recombinant form was expressed in Pichia pastoris and purified to yield a homogenous pool of the enzyme. The purified enzyme could be autoactivated at low pH via a bi-molecular mechanism, a process that was greatly accelerated by the presence of large, negatively charged molecules such as dextran sulfate. The enzyme could also apparently be processed to the correct size by an asparaginyl endopeptidase via cleavage in an unusual insertion N-terminal to the normal cleavage site used to yield the active form of the enzyme. Thus, there appear to be a number of ways in which this enzyme can be processed to its optimally active form prior to secretion by F. hepatica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".