Alternative substrates for wild‐type and L109A <i>E. coli</i> CTP synthases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cytidine 5'-triphosphate (CTP) synthase catalyses the ATP-dependent formation of CTP from uridine 5'-triphosphate using either NH(3) or l-glutamine as the nitrogen source. The hydrolysis of glutamine is catalysed in the C-terminal glutamine amide transfer domain and the nascent NH(3) that is generated is transferred via an NH(3) tunnel [Endrizzi, J.A., Kim, H., Anderson, P.M. & Baldwin, E.P. (2004) Biochemistry43, 6447-6463] to the active site of the N-terminal synthase domain where the amination reaction occurs. Replacement of Leu109 by alanine in Escherichia coli CTP synthase causes an uncoupling of glutamine hydrolysis and glutamine-dependent CTP formation [Iyengar, A. & Bearne, S.L. (2003) Biochem. J.369, 497-507]. To test our hypothesis that L109A CTP synthase has a constricted or a leaky NH(3) tunnel, we examined the ability of wild-type and L109A CTP synthases to utilize NH(3), NH(2)OH, and NH(2)NH(2) as exogenous substrates, and as nascent substrates generated via the hydrolysis of glutamine, gamma-glutamyl hydroxamate, and gamma-glutamyl hydrazide, respectively. We show that the uncoupling of the hydrolysis of gamma-glutamyl hydroxamate and nascent NH(2)OH production from N(4)-hydroxy-CTP formation is more pronounced with the L109A enzyme, relative to the wild-type CTP synthase. These results suggest that the NH(3) tunnel of L109A, in the presence of bound allosteric effector guanosine 5'-triphosphate, is not leaky but contains a constriction that discriminates between NH(3) and NH(2)OH on the basis of size.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".