MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000703265 · doi:10.1196/annals.1282.070

Relaxin Downregulates the Calcium Binding Protein S100A4 in MDA‐MB‐231 Human Breast Cancer Cells

2005· article· en· W2000703265 on OpenAlexafffund
Yvonne Radestock, Cuong Hoang‐Vu, Sabine Hombach‐Klonisch

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy-related medical research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersOntario Veterinary College, University of GuelphUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsRelaxinEstrogen receptorDownregulation and upregulationCancer researchBreast cancerEstrogenEstrogen receptor betaExtracellularTransfectionEndocrinologyChemistryReceptorCell cultureCancer cellEstrogen receptor alphaInternal medicineCancerMolecular biologyBiologyCell biologyMedicineBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Expressed in the human breast and in human breast cancer tissues, the heterodimeric peptide hormone relaxin is involved in extracellular matrix turnover. To investigate the role of relaxin in estrogen receptor-alpha negative human breast cancer cells, we established transfectants of the human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line stably overexpressing H2-relaxin (MDA-MB-231/pIRES-EGFP-H2). These transfectants produced and secreted functional relaxin. Our investigations revealed downregulation of mRNA and protein of the calcium binding protein S100A4 (metastasin) in MDA-MB-231/pIRES-EGFP-H2 transfectants, indicating a distinct and novel role for relaxin in estrogen receptor-alpha negative human breast cancer cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicPregnancy-related medical researchFrench-language works237,207