New Cationic and Zwitterionic Cp*M(κ<sup>2</sup>-P,S) Complexes (M = Rh, Ir): Divergent Reactivity Pathways Arising from Alternative Modes of Ancillary Ligand Participation in Substrate Activation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatment of 0.5 equiv of [Cp*IrCl(2)](2) with 1/3-P(i)Pr(2)-2-S(t)Bu-indene afforded Cp*Ir(Cl)(kappa(2)-3-P(i)Pr(2)-2-S-indene) (1) in 95% yield (Cp* = eta(5)-C(5)Me(5)). Addition of AgOTf or LiB(C(6)F(5))(4) x 2.5 OEt(2) to 1 gave [Cp*Ir(kappa(2)-3-P(i)Pr(2)-2-S-indene)](+)X(-) ([2](+)X(-); X = OTf, 78%; X = B(C(6)F(5))(4), 82%), which represent the first examples of isolable coordinatively unsaturated [Cp'Ir(kappa(2)-P,S)](+)X(-) complexes. Exposure of [2](+)OTf(-) to CO afforded [2 x CO](+)OTf(-) in 91% yield, while treatment of [2](+)B(C(6)F(5))(4)(-) with PMe(3) generated [2 x PMe(3)](+)B(C(6)F(5))(4)(-) in 94% yield. Treatment of 1 with K(2)CO(3) in CH(3)CN allowed for the isolation of the unusual adduct 3 x CH(3)CN (41% isolated yield), in which the CH(3)CN bridges the Lewis acidic Cp*Ir and Lewis basic indenide fragments of the targeted coordinatively unsaturated zwitterion Cp*Ir(kappa(2)-3-P(i)Pr(2)-2-S-indenide) (3). In contrast to the formation of [2 x CO](+)OTf(-), exposure of 3 x CH(3)CN to CO did not afford 3 x CO; instead, a clean 1:1 mixture of (kappa(2)-3-P(i)Pr(2)-2-S-indene)Ir(CO)(2) (4) and 1,2,3,4-tetramethylfulvene was generated. Treatment of [2](+)OTf(-) with Ph(2)SiH(2) resulted in the net loss of Ph(2)Si(OTf)H to give Cp*Ir(H)(kappa(2)-3-P(i)Pr(2)-2-S-indene) (5) in 44% yield. In contrast, treatment of [2](+)B(C(6)F(5))(4)(-) with Ph(2)SiH(2) or PhSiH(3) proceeded via H-Si addition across Ir-S to give the corresponding [Cp*Ir(H)(kappa(2)-3-P(i)Pr(2)-2-S(SiHPhX)-indene)](+)B(C(6)F(5))(4)(-) complexes 6a (X = Ph, 68%) or 6b (X = H, 77%), which feature a newly established S-Si linkage. Compound 6a was observed to effect net C-O bond cleavage in diethyl ether with net loss of Ph(2)Si(OEt)H, affording [Cp*Ir(H)(kappa(2)-3-P(i)Pr(2)-2-SEt-indene)](+)B(C(6)F(5))(4)(-) (7) in 77% yield. Furthermore, 6a proved capable of transferring Ph(2)SiH(2) to acetophenone, with concomitant regeneration of [2](+)B(C(6)F(5))(4)(-); however, [2](+)X(-) did not prove to be effective ketone hydrosilylation catalysts. Treatment of 1/3-P(i)Pr(2)-2-S(t)Bu-indene with 0.5 equiv of [Cp*RhCl(2)](2) gave Cp*Rh(Cl)(kappa(2)-3-P(i)Pr(2)-2-S-indene) (8) in 94% yield. Combination of 8 and LiB(C(6)F(5))(4) x 2.5 Et(2)O produced the coordinatively unsaturated cation [Cp*Rh(kappa(2)-3-P(i)Pr(2)-2-S-indene)](+)B(C(6)F(5))(4)(-) ([9](+)B(C(6)F(5))(4)(-)), which was transformed into [Cp*Rh(H)(kappa(2)-3-P(i)Pr(2)-2-S(SiHPh(2))-indene)](+)B(C(6)F(5))(4)(-) (10) via net H-Si addition of Ph(2)SiH(2) to Rh-S. Unlike [2](+)X(-), complex [9](+)B(C(6)F(5))(4)(-) was shown to be an effective catalyst for ketone hydrosilylation. Treatment of 3 x CH(3)CN with Ph(2)SiH(2) resulted in the loss of CH(3)CN, along with the formation of Cp*Ir(H)(kappa(2)-3-P(i)Pr(2)-2-S-(1-diphenylsilylindene)) (11) (64% isolated yield) as a mixture of diastereomers. The formation of 11 corresponds to heterolytic H-Si bond activation, involving net addition of H(-) and Ph(2)HSi(+) fragments to Ir and indenide in the unobserved zwitterion 3. Crystallographic data are provided for 1, [2 x CO](+)OTf(-), 3 x CH(3)CN, 7, and 11. Collectively, these results demonstrate the versatility of donor-functionalized indene ancillary ligands in allowing for the selection of divergent metal-ligand cooperativity pathways (simply by ancillary ligand deprotonation) in the activation of small molecule substrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".