MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Topological analysis and role of the transmembrane domain in polar targeting of PilS, a <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> sensor kinase

2000· article· en· W2001793440 on OpenAlexafffund
Julie Ethier, Jessica M. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsCalgary General HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersMedical Research Council CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsTransmembrane proteinBiologyTransmembrane domainCell biologyCytoplasmPilinTopology (electrical circuits)Membrane topologyPilusMembrane proteinBiophysicsBiochemistryMembraneGeneEscherichia coliReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, synthesis of pilin, the major protein subunit of the pili, is regulated by a two-component signal transduction system in which PilS is the sensor kinase. PilS is an inner membrane protein found at the poles of the bacterial cell. It is composed of three domains: an N-terminal hydrophobic domain; a central cytoplasmic linker region; and the C-terminal transmitter region conserved among other sensor kinases. The signal that activates PilS and, consequently, pilin transcription remains unknown. The membrane topology of the hydrophobic domain was determined using the lacZ and phoA gene fusion approach. In this report, we describe a topological model for PilS in which the hydrophobic domain forms six transmembrane helices, whereas the N- and C-termini are cytoplasmic. This topology is very stable, and the cytoplasmic C-terminus cannot cross the inner membrane. We also show that two of the six transmembrane segments are sufficient for membrane anchoring and polar localization of PilS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207