Oral immunization of mice with a glycoconjugate vaccine containing the O157 antigen of<i>Escherichia coli</i>O157:H7 admixed with cholera toxin fails to elicit protection against subsequent colonization by the pathogen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been postulated that a humoral immune response directed against the O157 antigen of Escherichia coli O157:H7, and expressed in the intestine, might afford protection from colonization and consequent infection by this enteric pathogen. The present study was conducted to determine whether such an immune response can be experimentally generated in mice. To this end, mice were orally immunized with a glycoconjugate vaccine consisting of horse serum albumin and the O157 polysaccharide admixed with the mucosal adjuvant, cholera toxin. Mice consistently developed robust local and systemic immune responses to the cholera toxin adjuvant, but were far from uniformly reactive to the test vaccine. Moreover, vaccinated mice were as susceptible to transient intestinal colonization following challenge with an isolate of E. coli O157:H7 as unvaccinated control mice. These results indicate that this vaccination approach is unlikely to be straightforward in target bovine or human hosts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".