Control of left ventricular mass by moxonidine involves reduced DNA synthesis and enhanced DNA fragmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a maladaptive process associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Regression of LVH is associated with reduced complications of hypertension. Moxonidine is an antihypertensive imidazoline compound that reduces blood pressure primarily by central inhibition of sympathetic outflow and by direct actions on the heart to release atrial natriuretic peptide, a vasodilator and an antihypertrophic cardiac hormone. This study investigated the effect of moxonidine on LVH and the mechanisms involved in this effect. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Spontaneously hypertensive rats were treated with several doses of moxonidine (s.c.) over 4 weeks. Blood pressure and heart rate were continuously monitored by telemetry. Body weight and water and food intake were measured weekly. Measurements also included left ventricular mass, DNA content, synthesis, fragmentation, and apoptotic/anti-apoptotic pathway proteins. KEY RESULTS: The decrease in mean arterial pressure stabilized at approximately -10 mm Hg after 1 week of treatment and thereafter. Compared to vehicle-treated rats (100%), left ventricular mass was dose- and time-dependently reduced by treatment. This reduction remained significantly lower after normalizing to body weight. Moxonidine reduced left ventricular DNA content and inhibited DNA synthesis. DNA fragmentation transiently, but significantly increased at 1 week of moxonidine treatment and was paralleled by elevated active caspase-3 protein. The highest dose significantly decreased the apoptotic protein Bax and all doses stimulated anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 after 4 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These studies implicate the modulation of cardiac DNA dynamics in the control of left ventricular mass by moxonidine in a rat model of hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".