FTIR Spectroscopy of the K Photointermediate of <i>Neurospora</i> Rhodopsin: Structural Changes of the Retinal, Protein, and Water Molecules after Photoisomerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neurospora rhodopsin (NR, also known as NOP-1) is the first rhodopsin of the haloarchaeal type found in eucaryotes. NR demonstrates a very high degree of conservation of the amino acids that constitute the proton-conducting pathway in bacteriorhodopsin (BR), a light-driven proton pump of archaea. Nevertheless, NR does not appear to pump protons, suggesting the absence of the reprotonation switch that is necessary for the active transport. The photocycle of NR is much slower than that of BR, similar to the case of pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR), an archaeal photosensory protein. The functional and photochemical differences between NR and BR should be explained in the structural context. In this paper, we studied the structural changes of NR following retinal photoisomerization by means of low-temperature Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and compared the obtained spectra with those for BR. For the spectroscopic analysis, we established the light-adaptation procedure for NR reconstituted into 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero- 3-phosphocholine/1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate (DMPC/DMPA) liposomes, which takes approximately 2 orders of magnitudes longer than in BR. The structure of the retinal chromophore and the hydrogen-bonding strength of the Schiff base in NR are similar to those in BR. Unique spectral features are observed for the S-H stretching vibrations of cysteine and amide-I vibrations for NR before and after retinal isomerization. In NR, there are no spectral changes assignable to the amide bands of alpha helices. The most prominent difference between NR and BR was seen for the water O-D stretching vibrations (measured in D(2)O). Unlike for haloarchaeal rhodopsins such as BR and ppR, no O-D stretches of water under strong hydrogen-bonded conditions (<2400 cm(-1)) were observed in the NR(K) minus NR difference spectra. This suggests a unique hydrogen-bonded network of the Schiff base region, which may be responsible for the lack of the reprotonation switch in NR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".