MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006824856 · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000211

From Molecules to Behavior: Organismal-Level Regulation of Ion Channel Trafficking

2009· article· en· W2006824856 on OpenAlexafffund
Eric S. Fortune, Maurice J. Chacron

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Biology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon channel regulation and function
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsExocytosisTransmembrane proteinBiologyMembrane proteinCell biologyEndocytosisIon channelMembrane transportEndoplasmic reticulumCell membraneTransport proteinTransmembrane channelsMembraneCellBiochemistryVoltage-gated ion channelReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transmembrane proteins are critical, not only for cell survival,but also for a myriad of physiological functions in multicellularorganisms. It is therefore necessary to have mechanisms thatregulate the number of these proteins present on the cellularmembrane at any given time. One such mechanism involvesprotein trafficking, or constitutive cycling, in which transmembraneproteins are continuously transferred between a pool locatedwithin the endoplasmic reticulum and the membrane surface byshuttle proteins (Figure 1) [1]. The actual number of proteins atthe membrane surface is controlled by the rate of exocytosis (i.e.,the rate at which proteins are inserted into the membrane) as wellas the rate of endocytosis (i.e., the rate at which proteins areremoved from the membrane). A higher rate of exocytosis willincrease the number of proteins at the membrane surface, whereasa lower rate of exocytosis will decrease that number [1–3].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS BiologySame topicIon channel regulation and functionFrench-language works237,207