New immediate release formulation for deterring abuse of methadone
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: Drug abusers are known to take a dosage form containing an opioid analgesic and crush, shear, grind, chew, or dissolve it in water or in alcohol, in order to extract the opioid component. OBJECTIVE: Develop an anti abuse immediate release formulation using methadone as model drug. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tablets combining methadone and alkalizing agents were manufactured. A methadone assay was used to determine extraction efficiency from tablets in aqueous and alcohol solvents. In vitro dissolution testing was used to determine drug release in different media. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: Meglumine-based formulations prevented extraction of 70 to 100% of methadone from tablets. Addition of this alkalizing agent caused methadone to precipitate out of a solution along with other ingredients and be retained on standard filters. Meglumine-containing and control tablets showed similar dissolution profiles in acidic media, suggesting adequate solubilisation of the drug early in the gastrointestinal tract. Finally, stability upon storage of the formulations for 6 months at 25°C/60%RH and 40°C/75%RH was confirmed. CONCLUSION: Incorporation of an alkalizing agent into methadone tablets significantly reduced the preparation of a methadone solution for intravenous administration and abuse, while allowing the formulation to release methadone in gastric media and provide desired pharmacological effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it