Synaptic behaviour and morphological modifications of the X and Y chromosomes during pachytene in three species of<i>Ctenomys</i>(Rodentia, Caviomorpha, Ctenomyidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synaptic behaviour and the progression of morphological differentiation of the XY chromosome pair during pachytene was studied for the first time in three species of the South American subterranean rodents of the genus Ctenomys (tuco-tucos). In general, synapsis progression in the sex pair could be subdivided into four substages: (i) initial partial synapsis of the X and Y chromosome axes and beginning of the differentiation of the unsynapsed regions; (ii) complete or almost complete synapsis of the Y axis accompanied with morphological differentiation of the unsynapsed region of the X chromosome; (iii) a novel stage exclusive to Ctenomys perrensi consisting in a retraction of the free X axis, associated with the formation of a homogeneous and dense structure along the synaptic region, which leads to the achievement of full synapsis between sex chromosomes; or (iv) an increase in morphological complexity involving extreme splitting of the XY pair. The implications of the peculiar synaptic behaviour displayed by sex chromosomes in C. perrensi, a species complex highly polymorphic for Robertsonian translocations, are discussed in relation to both the triggering of the pachytene checkpoint and the avoidance of non-homologous associations between sex chromosomes and the asynaptic pericentromeric regions of trivalents in translocation heterozygotes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".