MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008925932 · doi:10.1139/g09-013

Evolutionary diversification of satellite DNA sequences from<i>Leymus</i>(Poaceae: Triticeae)

2009· article· en· W2008925932 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kesara Anamthawat‐Jónsson, Torsten Wenke, Æ. Th. Thórsson, Sæmundur Sveinsson, Falk Zakrzewski, Thomas Schmidt

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
KeywordsBiologyLeymusTriticeaeSatellite DNATandem repeatRepeated sequenceGeneticsConcerted evolutionHeterochromatinPoaceaeEvolutionary biologyGenomeBotanyChromosomeGeneEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genus Leymus (lymegrass) comprises about 30 polyploid, perennial, temperate grass species in the tribe Triticeae (family Poaceae). Previous studies indicated a large diversity in the Leymus genome, and therefore, the aim of this study was to isolate new repetitive DNA sequences that can be used for differentiating Leymus species and elucidating their genomic relationships. A C0t-1 DNA plasmid library was generated from genomic DNA of American tetraploid species Leymus triticoides. A family of highly repetitive satellite DNA sequences, designated Lt1, was obtained from this library. The Lt1 family consisted of 380 bp SacI repeating units arranging in tandem arrays. A 120 bp MspI subfamily was discovered within this family, indicating that cytosine methylation may have played an important role in the evolution of satellite sequences. The Lt1 satellite was localized in the subtelomeric heterochromatic blocks of L. triticoides chromosomes, which are present on all chromosomes and often on both arms. The Lt1 sequences are abundant in L. triticoides but absent in its closely related species Leymus racemosus. Significant homology was found between the Lt1 family and numerous repetitive sequences from Poaceae species, indicating that the Lt1 is an ancient family of tandemly repeated sequences in grasses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.724

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207