The Interaction of a Neutral Ryanoid with the Ryanodine Receptor Channel Provides Insights into the Mechanisms by Which Ryanoid Binding Is Modulated by Voltage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an earlier investigation, we demonstrated that the likelihood of interaction of a positively charged ryanoid, 21-amino-9alpha-hydroxyryanodine, with the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-release channel (ryanodine receptor, RyR) is dependent on holding potential (Tanna, B., W. Welch, L. Ruest, J.L. Sutko, and A. J. Williams. 1998. J. Gen. Physiol. 112:55-69) and suggested that voltage dependence could result from either the translocation of the charged ligand to a site within the voltage drop across the channel or a voltage-driven alteration in receptor affinity. We now report experiments that allow us to assess the validity of these alternate mechanisms. Ryanodol is a neutral ryanoid that binds to RyR and induces modification of channel function. By determining the influence of transmembrane potential on the probability of channel modification by ryanodol and the rate constants of ryanodol association and dissociation, we demonstrate that the influence of voltage is qualitatively the same for both the neutral and positively charged ryanoids. These experiments establish that most, if not all, of the modification of ryanoid interaction with RyR by transmembrane holding potential results from a voltage-driven alteration in receptor affinity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".