MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

RAPID DETECTION OF <i>FRANCISELLA TULARENSIS</i> BY THE IMMUNOAFFINITY ASSAY ABICAP IN ENVIRONMENTAL AND HUMAN SAMPLES

2008· article· en· W2009142018 on OpenAlexaff
Roland Grunow, Peter Miethe, Wayne Conlan, E.-J. Finke, Steffen Friedewald, Mustafa Özçürümez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rapid Methods & Automation in Microbiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrancisella tularensisTularemiaOutbreakBiologyMicrobiologyDetection limitVirologyVeterinary medicineChromatographyMedicineChemistryVirulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Francisella tularensis is the causative agent of tularemia, a severe zoonotic infectious disease. The natural reservoir of the bacteria is not yet known precisely, but it may persist for over a year in water or mud. It is naturally maintained and spread by various terrestrial and aquatic mammals, and outbreaks in humans are often paralleled by enzootics or epizootics. The reasons for this seem to be multifactorial, though not well understood. Therefore, for epidemiological and outbreak investigations, a rapid hand‐held assay would be helpful. Here we described a column‐based immunofiltration assay called ABICAP, which has several characteristics that permit its application under field conditions. The assay can be performed within 25 min, with a detection limit of 10 3 bacteria. Further validation of the assay included the analytical range, precision, detection limit and performance for different human, animal and environmental sample matrices, accuracy, recovery, reproducibility and stability. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS The assay is an interesting tool applicable for the rapid detection of F. tularensis in various specimens under laboratory and field conditions. It can be used for the identification of reservoirs of F. tularensis in epidemiological studies, for the detection of sources of infection in outbreak situations of tularemia and in laboratory investigation of animal and human specimens. The methodological platform can be adapted to the detection of other microbiological agents and antigens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Rapid Methods & Automation in MicrobiologySame topicBacillus and Francisella bacterial researchFrench-language works237,207