Reaction of Thiols with N-Bonded Sulfenamide Complexes of Cobalt(III): Steric Effect and Reaction Pathway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The products and kinetics of the reaction of several thiols (RSH = 2-aminoethanethiol, cysteine, penicillamine, cysteine ethyl ester) with N-bonded sulfenamide complexes ([Co(en)(2)(NH(2)S(CH(2))(2)NH(2)](3+) (IA), [Co(en)(2)(NH(2)SCH(2)CH(CO(2)H)NH(2)](3+) (IC), [Co(en)(2)(NH(2)SC(CH(3))(2)CH(CO(2)H)NH(2)](3+) (IP)) have been studied. The reaction proceeds by nucleophilic attack at sulfur with cleavage of the N-S bond to form a disulfide and leave a coordinated NH(3) ligand. The kinetics (pH 4-10) reveal that the deprotonated thiol, RS(-), is the reactive nucleophile and that the N-deprotonated sulfenamide complex is unreactive. The reactions of IP are approximately 10(4) times slower than those of IA or IC, and the reasons and consequences of this large steric effect are discussed. It is concluded, on the basis of these and other observations from the literature, that there will be substantial steric retardation to nucleophilic attack at two-coordinate sulfur in a R-C(CH(3))(2)-S-X-R' unit because of the regiospecificity of the reaction. The acid dissociation constants of IP and the X-ray structure of its bromide salt also are reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".